Monday, March 31, 2008

Hillary Clinton: Bosnia Trip Exposes Care less Mother

Hillary Clinton's memory failed her when relating the "facts" about a Bosnia trip years back during the Clinton Administration.

How does one ever forget the circumstances - a first - of threat to not only your own life, but to your child's life, while on a trip, any place, any time?

According to a CBS News Blog (Horserace) report:

March 24, 2008 Clinton's Bosnia Trip Claims Scrutinized by Brian Montopoli

...Attkisson has now written her own take on the events, which has just gone up over at the Couric & Co. blog. There, Attkisson reports that while the trip was dangerous - it was "easy to imagine we may be narrowly escaping enemy bullets," she writes – "we had no known incidents of enemy fire on our aircraft."

"To be sure, it was not the 'safest' trip for a First Lady to take: there were serious risks in traveling to Bosnia, even for the President's wife under the vigilant protection of the US military," she concludes. "It took some guts for her to go. But I don't recall, and did not note, any close calls on this trip with sniper fire or any other dangers."


http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/03/24/politics/horserace/entry3963241.shtml

March 24, 2008, 12:14 PM Not The Safest Trip, But No Sniper Fire Posted by Sharyl Attkisson

http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/03/24/couricandco/entry3962828.shtml


If Attkisson's account is accurate, and there were known dangers prior to the Bosnia trip, thus dangerous and it wasn't the 'safest' trip for a First Lady to take, and there were serious risks in traveling to Bosnia, even for the President's wife under the vigilant protection of the US military - wasn't the First Daughter, Chelsea, placed in harm's way?

Attkisson continues to give details which raise even further questions about mommy Hillary Clinton's judgement and parental responsibility:

Attkisson:

Due to the possibility of sniper fire, our pilots used what we were told are "assault take-offs and landings." In short, the climb and descent are very fast, and very steep to minimize exposure to hostile fire on the ground.

It's exciting and frightening and, in the midst of it all, wearing our helmets and bulletproof vests, it's easy to imagine we may be narrowly escaping enemy bullets.

http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/03/24/politics/horserace/entry3963241.shtml


Was Chelsea wearing a helmet and bulletproof vest during the takeoffs or landings?

Wasn't Chelsea placed in potentially so dangerous a situation as to be targeted and even killed by sniper fire?

Critics of Clinton's faulty recall now are missing the far larger point than her faulty memory about coming under direct sniper fire.

According to no less than the forementioned CBS News Correspondent Sharyl Attkisson in the article Not The Safest Trip, But No Sniper Fire - the Press was aware of the dangers of a trip that was not the 'safest' trip for a First Lady to take...

Attkisson further states:

Due to the possibility of sniper fire, our pilots used what we were told are "assault take-offs and landings." In short, the climb and descent are very fast, and very steep to minimize exposure to hostile fire on the ground.

http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/03/24/couricandco/entry3962828.shtml


If it wasn't the 'safest' trip for the First Lady, it wasn't the 'safest' trip for the First Lady's daughter.

If there was the possibility of sniper fire to put the First Lady's life in danger, there was the same possibility of sniper fire to put the First Daughter's life in danger.

Wonder whether anyone will ask Chelsea now what she thinks of a father and a mother who would permit her to accompany one or the other on a trip where it was known there could be "possibility of sniper fire" that might put her life at risk.

Will Chelsea face any question by anyone about whether or not she was among those who wore as CBS News Correspondent Sharyl Attkisson says in the article Not The Safest Trip, But No Sniper Fire - helmets and bullet proof vests?

Hey Chelsea, as First Daughter you accompanied your mother to Bosnia, right? Were you or your mother wearing a helmet or bullet proof vest? Your mother was aware at some point that there could be danger and the possibility of sniper fire in such a trip to Bosnia, right? Before landing, perhaps. Or when reporters began putting on helmets and bullet proof vests? Were you aware, Chelsea, a sniper's bullet could rifle through your skull, killing you dead? What do you think of that and of your mother for knowingly placing your life in danger?

Most observors recognize faulty recall can happen to the best of the best. To forget there were military reports about the dangers prior to the trip or while on the airplane going into Bosnia, and not to mention now a report was available beforehand - that isn't faulty memory. That's hide the facts from the public by a story of faulty memory about direct sniper fire and maybe nobody will ask what you knew BEFORE taking the trip. Maybe nobody will ask why you would place your own daughter at risk of death or bodily harm, irreversible bodily harm.

Even more damning are the words of Howard Wolfson according to the Attkisson report of what was said during a media 'conference call:'

Update: In a conference call with reporters this afternoon, Clinton spokesman Howard Wolfson answered questions about Clinton's assertions, allowing that it is possible she "misspoke."

Wolfson: "The facts are clear from contemporaneous news accounts that she was entering a potentially dangerous situation. She has written about this before, she has talked about this before and there you have it. Now, is it possible that in the most recent instance in which she discussed this that she misspoke, with regards to the exit from the plane, but there's no question that I hope everyone is clear about this in the reporting, there is no question if you look at these contemporaneous accounts that she was going to a potential combat zone, that it was by the front lines and the first person since Eleanore Roosevelt to do that and she was going into a hostile military environment."

http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/03/24/couricandco/entry3962828.shtml


The media is complicit now by not asking Hillary Clinton what military reports were available to her and obviously the Press before the Bosnia trip that would reveal she "was going to a potential combat zone... by the front lines, and the first person since Eleanore Roosevelt... going into a hostile military environment."!!

Outing faulty memory of being under direct sniper fire is nothing more than a cover-up of the irresponsibility of a mother taking her child to a "potential combat zone... front lines... hostile military environment."

Nobody else is asking: If the trip was in any way beforehand known to have even the potential of danger to your own daughter, Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton, why would you take your own daughter on the trip?

OK, go yourself, have "some guts to go" (as Attkisson relates) yourself. But don't take your daughter to "a potential combat zone... front lines... hostile military environment."

Would even the political you, as a mother, stoop so low as to tout years later, that you took your own daughter to a dangerous location and got off the airplane under any kind of sniper fire - all to prove what?

That you've faced danger enough to be seen as a commander-in-=chief? You were the first First Lady since Eleanor Roosevelt to go to a "hostile military environment."

What about your daughter? Does she have the skills to face danger too because she was not in the 'safest' location in the world as a child, taken there by her mother?

Really, what other mother could ever trust you on anything, now.

If you could put your own daughter at risk, knowingly, to suit your own selfish purposes, whatever they were at the time, and whatever they are now, what is there to believe about your motivations, but the lowest of the low.

And who is to believe the motivations of a mainstream media, all of the media, that suppresses the fact Bosnia was "a potential combat zone," but you took your daughter there anyway.

(Net the Truth Online)

March 24, 2008, 1:14 PM
Clinton's Bosnia Trip Claims Scrutinized
Posted by Brian Montopoli|
A 12-year-old report by CBS News' Sharyl Attkisson has been making the rounds following scrutiny of Hillary Clinton's claim that she and her party landed "under sniper fire" and were told to "run to our cars" during a 1996 trip to Bosnia. Clinton also said there was "no greeting ceremony."

Attkisson's report seems to contradict Clinton's assertion. In it, Clinton is seen waving as she arrives in Bosnia. She is greeted by the country's acting president as well as an eight-year-old girl. You can watch the report by clicking on the video box at left.

On Sunday, the Washington Post wrote that there are "numerous problems with Clinton's version of events," which have been challenged by the comedian Sinbad, who accompanied her on the trip. "A review of nearly 100 news accounts of her visit shows that not a single newspaper or television station reported any security threat to the first lady," writes the Post.

Attkisson has now written her own take on the events, which has just gone up over at the Couric & Co. blog. There, Attkisson reports that while the trip was dangerous – it was "easy to imagine we may be narrowly escaping enemy bullets," she writes – "we had no known incidents of enemy fire on our aircraft."

"To be sure, it was not the 'safest' trip for a First Lady to take: there were serious risks in traveling to Bosnia, even for the President's wife under the vigilant protection of the US military," she concludes. "It took some guts for her to go. But I don't recall, and did not note, any close calls on this trip with sniper fire or any other dangers."
..

http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/03/24/politics/horserace/entry3963241.shtml

Sunday, March 30, 2008

Black Box Voting Founder Barred from Democratic Underground

Interesting development in that Bev Harris the founder of Black Box Voting had herself been banned from the site known as Democratic Underground according to a Wired article. Way back when...

The Wired article links to Democratic Underground and a letter of explanation is included on the referenced site.

Interesting commentary here.

See Keith Olbermann's blog here.

More discussion on DU than you ever may need to know

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=203&topic_id=101119#101582

Apparently there is a site tagged blackboxvoting.com not affiliated with Bev Harris

http://blackboxvoting.com/s9/

David Allen and Plan 9

http://liheliso.com/Issue5/Issue5.html#An_Interview_with_David_Allen

An editor speaks
Wednesday, July 21, 2004 7:23 am
Bev Harris, “Black Box Voting” and the public trashing of reputations
Filed under: Black-box voting — Lex @ 7:23 am

http://blogontherun.wordpress.com/2004/07/21/bev-harris-black-box-voting-and-the-public-trashing-of-reputations/

BlackBoxVoting Investigates NH Recount: 3-28-08: Chain of Custody Investigation: Ballot washing?

http://www.democracyfornewhampshire.com/node/view/5646

videos linked

http://www.democracyfornewhampshire.com/taxonomy/page/or/213

(Net the Truth Online)

Site Bars Black Box Voting Head
Joanna Glasner

Democratic Underground, a political discussion site that has been a popular forum for debate on the reliability of computerized voting machines, has barred one of its most prominent and outspoken contributors on the topic from further posting.

In a written statement, site administrators said Friday that they barred Bev Harris, founder of Black Box Voting, because her postings on the site "have made positive discussion of verified voting increasingly difficult."

Democratic Underground said Harris' postings have been belligerent at times to other members of the forum and that she used the website to threaten its operators with lawsuits.

"We no longer believe that it is productive to allow her to use DU as a platform to promote herself while simultaneously trashing us, our moderators and others who have been previously supportive of her cause," site administrators wrote in the statement.

http://www.wired.com/techbiz/media/news/2004/12/65928


Excerpt continued:

Last week Olbermann criticized Harris for not publicly releasing film footage said to reveal questionable vote-tabulating practices in Volusia County, Florida. The footage, which was filmed by a documentary crew that has been following Harris for a year, is said to show paper voting records from a bag of garbage that Harris obtained after scuffling with Volusia County election officials outside their offices. Harris has implied on her website and in other public statements that the records indicate actions that "are consistent with fraud."

Olbermann originally wrote that Harris should release the footage to back her claims and said that when his staff spoke with her after his initial blog entry about it, she was "belligerent, threatening and demanding" with them. Some members of Democratic Underground have speculated that Harris wants to hold onto the footage so the filmmakers can release it in their documentary and make a bigger publicity splash.

But Harris said she did not receive calls from the television program asking for the footage and is not able to release it to the TV station because it is being used in a lawsuit against the county. She also said the charge that she threatened Olbermann's staff is untrue.

But some members of Democratic Underground have noted that Olbermann's description of Harris' behavior is consistent with their experiences with her. And others have questioned whether she is the best public representative for the voting activist movement.

"No one denies she's done great work," wrote one forum member who goes by the name AmyCrat. "It's her PR skills that are potentially hurting the whole effort (and her own efforts). Good intentions aren't an excuse for unprofessional behavior."

http://www.wired.com/techbiz/media/news/2004/12/65928


Democratic Underground Statement on Bev Harris situation

Over the past two years Bev Harris has received a great deal of support from the members of Democratic Underground, in her research, publicity efforts, and fundraising. In return we have played host to an 18 month-long squabble between Ms. Harris and other verified voting activists, and have even been threatened with lawuits by Ms. Harris herself. Despite this, we have publicly remained mostly silent on the verified voting squabbles.

We believe verified voting is a topic of crucial importance, and have been uncomfortable taking sides on an issue which, frankly, we should all be on the same side of anyway. Therefore we have kept most of our correspondence with the various factions private and attempted to cool things down behind the scenes. Like all issues discussed at DU, we have tried to focus the discussion of verified voting on the topic at hand, and not on the personalities of the participants. However, in light of the recent troubles, we feel compelled to make a statement.

In 2003 Bev Harris, along with a few other verified voting activists, were banned from DU for engaging in personal squabbles on the message board after they were repeatedly instructed to stop. Around that time, Ms. Harris threatened us with a libel lawsuit, claiming that we could be held responsible for comments made by other message board members who doubted the credibility of her project. She never followed through on this threat and we never heard from her lawyers.

Ms. Harris was reinstated shortly afterwards, after agreeing to put an end to the problems that got her banned in the first place. Nonetheless, those problems periodically recurred after her reinstatement. A few weeks ago, Ms. Harris again used our website to threaten DU with lawsuits, in her postings, in private messages to other members, and in rude alerts she sent to the moderators.

We sent a message to Ms. Harris telling her to stop hassling our moderators and members, and informing her that if she had a legal concern, she needed to contact us directly. We also let her know that her continued participation on this message board was dependent upon her behavior. The legal threats stopped, but we received no response from either Ms. Harris or her lawyers.

This is our personal experience with Ms. Harris. We cannot confirm or deny the veracity of claims made by others, including many former colleagues, her former publisher, and Keith Olbermann. But we can confirm that the claims made by others about Ms. Harris are not inconsistent with our own experiences...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x108750


On Harris' Black Box Voting Forum in a thread entitled, 3-20-08: Is ballot alteration possible on a massive scale?, recently Harris posted a warning to a poster March 28, 2008, and closed the thread stating it was "overlong."

The original posting Harris made can be viewed on the Black Box Voting site, and is linked here

More

Voter fraud watchdog has selective bite

...But this kind of effort to connect Republicans with organized efforts at manipulating voting machines is flagrantly partisan and disgusting, especially with all its purporting "independence" and "objectivity". Um, no, Bev and Steve and Lynn. I think it's pretty clear where your agenda lies. And the VoteWatch site seems more a way to advance the Democratic agenda while bringing publicity to a (watch carefully now) publicity firm than any kind of public service. In fact, I'd call it a rank public disservice...

http://bias.blogfodder.net/archives/2002_11_03.html


It's all Republican fraud?

can this really be true: diabolic diebold
September 3, 2004


http://lessig.org/blog/2004/09/can_this_really_be_true_diabol.html


Related

No Doctored DRE
Democrats use computer hysteria to get out the vote.
Tuesday, July 27, 2004 12:01 a.m. EDT
John Fund

BOSTON--You don't have to go far here to find a Democrat who says the 2000 election was stolen.

...The leading crusader against DREs is Bev Harris, a journalist from Seattle, who has co-authored a book called "Black Box Voting." But she suffered a blow to her credibility this month when it was revealed that last year she had joined computer programmer Jim March in filing a "whistle-blower" lawsuit in California that seeks monetary damages from Diebold for machine failures there. The lawsuit, known as a qui tam because it rewards those who help the government identify fraud, would allow Ms. Harris and Mr. March to collect up to 30% of any award. "This is about money now--a case of the capitalist system at work," Mr. March told the AP.
Their lawsuit has touched off a firestorm of criticism from other anti-DRE activists. They note that last year Ms. Harris wrote on the Web site Democratic Underground that she and her colleagues "came to the conclusion that doing this for money was the wrong thing to do . . . we aren't soiling ourselves with Qui Tam money." David Allen, Ms. Harris' co-author and publisher, is deeply disappointed she has allowed critics to question her motives. A liberal Democrat, he thinks she and others exaggerate the danger of hackers stealing an election. "I think this whole debate has been cast too much in partisan terms," he says. "The incompetence of the voting machine companies is real enough. We would never guard our currency at the U.S. Mint the way we guard the currency of democracy--votes."

Ms. Harris responds that she has legal disputes with Mr. Allen and believes other Internet activists have filed qui tam lawsuits that are under seal. She says any money from a settlement with Diebold would go to a non-profit foundation investigating electronic voting. She is employed by that same foundation.

Michael Shamos, who was the official examiner of electronic voting systems for Pennsylvania and Texas for 20 years, says there has not been a single verified incident of tampering with an electronic machine. For six years, he's posted a challenge on the Internet offering $10,000 to anyone who can tamper undetectably with a DRE machine under real-world conditions. No one has claimed the money. "The worst thing we could do is listen to some of the activists, abandon the new technology and return to means of voting that are even less safe and accurate," he says.

Fixes for the real problems with DREs are in the works. Woefully inadequate federal standards for testing voting machines are being toughened. A system is being developed in which each voter would receive a record of his choices that would be put into a code only decipherable by election judges. After the polls closed, all receipts would be posted on the Internet. Voters could use their serial number to find the image of their receipt, and make sure it matched the one they got at the polls.

http://www.opinionjournal.com/diary/?id=110005405


Related (Is the term black box voting exclusive to one or another non-profit or for-profit organization?) (How about the term "clean up crew?"

Black Box Notes

http://blackboxnotes.blogspot.com/

search cleanup crew bev harris

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22cleanup+crew%22+voting+bev+harris&btnG=Search

org vs .com

http://www.thoughtcrimes.org/blame_andy.htm

Black Box Voting dot com postings and info (Dan Rather link report transcript)

http://blackboxvoting.com/s9/index.php?/categories/10-Election-Day-Fiascos

How the Grinch stole the White House . . . again
By Alan Waldman

http://www.onlinejournal.com/evoting/112004Waldman/112004waldman.html


Related Clint Curtis


Black Box Voting

Update on Clint Curtis story, SATURDAY, DEC 11, 2004

Update THURSDAY, DEC. 9, 2004: Update on Black Box Voting actions

Update TUESDAY, DEC. 7, 2004: Why the Feeney vote-rigging story sounds like disinformation -- as Madsen writes it. UPDATED: BradBlog is more credible, but a few questions remain.

http://www.thoughtcrimes.org/blame_andy.htm

http://www.thoughtcrimes.org/blame_andy.htm#feeney


Related

VotePA group discusses Clint Curtis favorably

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/VotePA/msearch?query=clint+curtis&submit=Search&charset=windows-1252

Voice of the Voters

Archived Voice of the Voters! shows are available here.http://mysite.verizon.net/resq4lzq/cvi/id267.html

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/VotePA/message/3753

Thursday, March 27, 2008

Obama Inspiring Social Activism in Philadelphia Elsewhere


Obama Works

Obama Works is a grassroots organization currently taking shape nationwide. Obama Works volunteers intend to implement Barack Obama’s message of change through public service, harnessing the immense energy created by his presidential bid to serve their communities.

Our group, according to organizer Amirah Naim, is ‘‘working to transcend our differences and transform our country.’’

We have begun by organizing local Obama supporters throughout PA, CT and NJ, to show our communities that politics is not merely about elections, but about civic participation. We will continue to develop these projects nationwide through the primaries, the general election, and beyond.

Obama Works is a grassroots organization dedicated to promoting a new kind of politics. Inspired by Barack Obama's experience as a community organizer and his message that ordinary citizens can create real change, Obama Works seeks to unite politics and service by mobilizing Obama supporters to improve their neighborhoods through public service.

http://whyobamaworks.org/

Pennsylvania Barack Obama Visits Scheduled

Obama to visit for town meeting
By The Tribune-Review
Thursday, March 27, 2008

Sen. Barack Obama will make Westmoreland County and Pittsburgh among the first stops Friday as part of his six-day "Road to Change" campaign bus tour through Pennsylvania.
The Illinois senator will hold a town hall meeting at 5:30 p.m. in the gymnasium at Hempfield Area High School, along Route 136, near Greensburg. Doors open at 3:30 p.m.

About 1,500 free tickets available for the meeting were reserved within hours of the campaign's announcement of the event, according to the Democratic presidential candidate's Web site.

Obama will travel to Hempfield after an 11 a.m. campaign event at Soldiers and Sailors Hall in Pittsburgh's Oakland neighborhood. Doors open at 9 a.m.
Free tickets for the Oakland meeting are available at the Obama for America Office Pittsburgh headquarters at 208 N. Highland Ave. from 9 a.m. to 9 p.m. today.

http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/election/s_559249.html


Related

Hillary Clinton In County near 70% Could Care Less

While an online poll is never considered the most accurate, (double-quadruple voting), it is somewhat telling that in the Herald-Standard poll some 2,682 'somebodies' or half, or one-fourth, bothered to vote on the matter. More telling is the voter registration favors Democrats over Republican some 4-1. So one could assess that more Democrats responded than Republicans.

According to the online poll results, almost 70 percent of respondents could care less about the Hillary Clinton recent visit to the county of Fayette.

25 percent cared.

While not a scientific way to conduct a poll, oddly enough, in past elections a turnout rate of about 25 to 30 percent has been the norm.

Statewide in Pennsylvania, according to recent reports, some overwhelming 160,000 more in the state registered anew or switched party affiliation to give the Democrats a 4 million membership count for this Presidential Election.

(Net the Truth Online)

Video of Clinton's appearance at the Eberly Campus Penn State. See

http://www.heraldstandard.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=19420021&BRD=2280&PAG=461&dept_id=480247&rfi=6

HSTV programming here.

Reports about Hillary Clinton's visit included:

Clinton plans practical first 100 days
By Mike Wereschagin, David M. Brown and Salena Zito
TRIBUNE-REVIEW
Thursday, March 27, 2008

Audio: Clinton interview

Sen. Hillary Clinton sat for a 90-minute interview Tuesday with Pittsburgh Tribune-Review reporters and editors. The audio of the interview is divided into two parts and can be downloaded.

http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/multimedia/s_559204.html


Clinton to campaign in Fayette Monday By: Amy Zalar, Herald-Standard
03/22/2008

http://www.heraldstandard.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=19414386&BRD=2280&PAG=461&dept_id=480247&rfi=6


Clinton urges $30 billion in housing aid
By David M. Brown and Mike Wereschagin
TRIBUNE-REVIEW
Tuesday, March 25, 2008

http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/tribunereview/news/fayette/s_558899.html


Herald-Standard Poll What do you think of Hillary Clinton coming to Fayette County?

Great thing
25.7%

Good thing
2.9%

Bad thing
1.8%

Could care less
69.6%

votes: 2682

http://www.heraldstandard.com/site/PollAnswer.cfm?brd=2280&pag=461&poll_id=35423&vote=D

Wednesday, March 26, 2008

Barack Obama Global Poverty Act Meets Conservative Resistance

How is this measure proposed by Barack Obama any different than President George Bush giving billions of taxpayers hard earned monies for combatting AIDS in Africa?

We're tracking... for truth... see below...

It appears the Global Poverty Act bill doesn't commit the US to a global tax which would force participation by individuals in the United States by way of coerced taxation.

However, apparently, the United States signed onto the UN's 8 Millennium Goals

Goals for a New Millennium

In September 2000, more world leaders met at UN Headquarters in New York City for the “Millennium Summit” than for any other event in history. There, they adopted the Millennium Declaration, which put into words their hopes for a more prosperous world. But the declaration was not just any UN resolution. It set specific goals, gave deadlines for many of them and was accepted by every country at the summit.

The eight goals are today known as the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). Most of them are set to be achieved by 2015 and each one focuses on a different global concern.

The MDGs

Goal 1: Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger
Goal 2: Achieve universal primary education
Goal 3: Promote gender equality and empower women
Goal 4: Reduce child deaths
Goal 5: Improve mothers’ health
Goal 6: Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases
Goal 7: Ensure environmental sustainability
Goal 8: Develop a global partnership for development

http://www.unausa.org/site/pp.asp?c=fvKRI8MPJpF&b=551463


Barack Obama has answered questions from the UN which show his positions in key areas.

The US already committed to support of UN Millennium Development Goals.

The Global Poverty Act appears to lend support for the UN Goal to end poverty by 1015, but as proposed doesn't commit the US to taxation for that specific purpose...

We'll be watching to determine how Obama will propose carrying out his answer concerning global climate change, however.

(Net the Truth Online)

United Nations Association of the USA (UNA-USA)
Better World Campaign (BWC)
2008 Presidential Candidate Questionnaire on US-UN Relations

Response from Barack Obama

8. Poverty

One third of the world’s population – more than 2 billion people – live in abject poverty. Hunger, disease, and illiteracy present both moral and security issues. The scale and scope of global poverty demands broad international cooperation. At the urging of the UN and the international donor community, world leaders agreed in 2000 to a specific, prioritized development agenda for international focus and commitment. The Millennium Development Goals (or MDGs) include eight concrete objectives for achievement by 2015: cutting extreme poverty in half; achieving universal primary education; empowering women; reducing child and maternal mortality; reversing the spread of AIDS and other deadly diseases; protecting the environment; and cooperating internationally on these aims. The MDGs have been endorsed by Presidents Clinton and George Bush.

Do you support the MDGs, the United Nations’ agreed international framework for alleviating global poverty? As President, what specific steps would you take to achieve these goals?

I fully support the Millennium Development Goals. In the 21st century, progress must not just mean freedom – it must mean freedom from fear and freedom from want. The lesson of my own experience – as an American boy living in Indonesia, as a community organizer in neighborhoods left behind by global change, and as a state senator and United States senator – is that change must come from the bottom up. In 2000, the Member states of the United Nations unanimously agreed to the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). These eight goals offer a people-centered vision of development, including a commitment to cut extreme poverty in half by 2015. As President, I will make the MDGs America’s goals.

http://www.unausa.org/site/pp.asp?c=fvKRI8MPJpF&b=3879851


Global Poverty Act of 2007
House: Global Poverty Act H.R. 1302
Senate: Global Poverty Act S.2433

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-2433

http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h1302/show

http://www.borgenproject.org/globalpovertyact.html

http://www.thomas.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:S.2433:



Anti-poverty bill stirs blog-world controversy
by SHNS on Thu, 02/21/2008 - 14:17. By LES BLUMENTHAL, McClatchy Newspapers

http://www.scrippsnews.com/node/30908


Legislature 2008
Rep. Smith: Poverty act critics' real target is Obama
By Les Blumenthal
McClatchy Newspapers

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/politics/2004193014_poverty21.html


Thu, Feb 21, 2008 8:33pm ET
Send to a friend Print Version
Quoting Kincaid, Limbaugh falsely asserted Obama bill "would commit the United States to spending 0.7 percent of GDP on foreign aid"
Summary: Reading from a column by Accuracy in Media editor and writer Cliff Kincaid, Rush Limbaugh falsely asserted on his nationally syndicated radio show that the Global Poverty Act, sponsored by Sen. Barack Obama, "would commit the United States to spending 0.7 percent of GDP on foreign aid."

On the February 14 edition of his nationally syndicated radio show, Rush Limbaugh read a portion of a February 12 column by Cliff Kincaid, editor and writer at the right-wing "watchdog of the news media" organization Accuracy in Media, in which Kincaid falsely asserted that the Global Poverty Act, sponsored by Sen. Barack Obama, "would commit the U.S. to spending 0.7 percent of gross national product on foreign aid, which amounts to a phenomenal 13-year total of $845 billion over and above what the U.S. already spends." Limbaugh also read Kincaid's false statement that the bill "could result in the imposition of a global tax on the United States." In fact, the bill does not impose a tax on the United States or allow any other body to impose a tax. In his column, Kincaid further falsely asserted that the legislation "makes levels of U.S. foreign aid spending subservient to the dictates of the United Nations."

In fact, while the Global Poverty Act would proclaim that "[i]t is the policy of the United States to promote the reduction of global poverty, the elimination of extreme global poverty, and the achievement of the Millennium Development Goal of reducing by one-half the proportion of people worldwide, between 1990 and 2015, who live on less than $1 per day," the act would establish no specific funding source, would not commit the United States to any targeted level of spending, and specifically would require the president -- not the United Nations -- to "develop and implement a comprehensive strategy to further the United States foreign policy objective of promoting the reduction of global poverty, the elimination of extreme global poverty, and the achievement of the Millennium Development Goal of reducing by one-half the proportion of people worldwide, between 1990 and 2015, who live on less than $1 per day."

... In fact, the Global Poverty Act, while noting several Millennium Project goals and declaring that the goal of reducing global poverty by 2015 "is the policy of the United States," does not address the recommendation of spending 0.7 percent of GNP on foreign aid to achieve the Millennium Project goals. According to the Millennium Project website, the 0.7 percent of GNP recommendation "was first made 35 years ago in a General Assembly resolution." The Global Poverty Act directs the president, acting through the secretary of state, to develop a strategy to meet the goal of reducing poverty. It also states that strategy "should include" among its components "[i]mproving the effectiveness of development assistance and making available additional overall United States assistance levels as appropriate," but it does not require that foreign aid be increased or mandate a funding level for foreign assistance. The Global Poverty Act of 2007 was sponsored in the House of Representatives by Rep. Adam Smith (D-WA).

Additionally, while Kincaid wrote that "Jeffrey Sachs, who runs the U.N.'s 'Millennium Project,' says that the U.N. plan to force the U.S. to pay 0.7 percent of GNP in increased foreign aid spending would add $65 billion a year to what the U.S. already spends" and added that "the only way to raise that kind of money, Sachs has written, is through a global tax, preferably on carbon-emitting fossil fuels," the bill does not impose a tax, nor does it give the U.N. the power to "force the U.S. to pay 0.7 of GNP in increased foreign aid" or to impose a tax...

http://mediamatters.org/items/200802210011



U.S. Africa Policy: An Unparalleled Partnership Strengthening Democracy, Overcoming Poverty, and Saving Lives
President And Mrs. Bush's Africa Trip Underscores The New Approach To Africa Policy Under This Administration, And Builds On A Dramatic Increase In The United States' Commitment To African Development

On February 14, 2008, President Bush discussed his upcoming trip to Africa and the Administration's strong commitment to growth and development on the African continent.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/africa/


George W. Bush has "quadrupled aid to the poorest people on the planet"

http://current.com/items/88854714_george_w_bush_has_quadrupled_aid_to_the_poorest_people_on_the_planet


Bush Plans Africa Trip to Tout HIV/AIDS Program
by Michele Kelemen

...This is clearly a trip about building a different sort of legacy for Bush. Before he spoke Thursday at the Smithsonian's Museum of African Art, his aides played a newly produced video touting PEPFAR — a $15 billion program to fight HIV/AIDS.

The Africa trip is meant to highlight the administration's work on AIDS and Malaria. Bush's former speech writer Michael Gerson says the Bush years should be known for its soft power approach in Africa.

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=19053773


Conservatives Place Hold on Obama's Global Poverty Bill
By Pete Winn
CNSNews.com Senior Staff Writer
February 25, 2008

(CNSNews.com) - Two conservative members of the U.S. Senate have anonymously placed a hold on Sen. Barack Obama's (D-Ill.) global poverty bill, Cybercast News Service has learned.

The effort is an attempt to slow down the progress of a bill (S. 2433) that conservative analysts say could eventually force the U.S. to increase its foreign aid by hundreds of billions of dollars.

Cliff Kincaid of Accuracy in Media, a conservative media watchdog, said S. 2433 has been getting "a pass" from Congress. It received absolutely no scrutiny in the House last fall, when it was passed on a voice vote, and no scrutiny last week in the Senate, when the Foreign Relations Committee also passed it on a voice vote...

http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPolitics.asp?Page=/Politics/archive/200802/POL20080225a.html


Barack Obama and the Global Poverty Act
By Vincent Gioia
Mar 13, 2008

Overlooked in the fervor to select a Democrat nominee is what Barack Obama really stands for; we can only hope this will not be the case in the national election if Obama is chosen. There are many ideas proposed by Obama to criticize him about but one that stands out and has great implications is the Global Poverty Act Obama supports.

The Global Poverty Act (S.2433) would require the United States to spend $845 billion ($845,000,000,000.00) on welfare to third-world countries. This amounts to a tax of over $2,000 on each man, woman and child in the United States. The foreign aid budget now stands at $300 billion; the Act would add the additional expenditure to the already huge amount allocated to assist the world.

As Phyllis Schlafly wrote recently:

"Obama's costly, dangerous and altogether bad bill (S. 2433), which could come up in the Senate any day, is called the Global Poverty Act. It would commit U.S. taxpayers to spend 0.7 percent of our Gross Domestic Product on foreign handouts..."

WorldNetDaily.com quotes Cliff Kincaid at Accuracy in Media as saying: "[T]he legislation, if approved, dedicates 0.7 percent of the U.S. gross national product to foreign aid, which over 13 years... would amount to $845 billion 'over and above what the U.S. already spends. "The plan passed the House in 2007 'because most members didn't realize what was in it.' Congressional sponsors have been careful not to calculate the amount of foreign aid spending that it would require." (Emphasis added to show the seriousness of the chance this horrendous bill may become law.)


http://www.nationalledger.com/artman/publish/article_272619433.shtml



Overlooked in the fervor to select a Democrat nominee is what Barack Obama really stands for; we can only hope this will not be the case in the national election if Obama is chosen. There are many ideas proposed by Obama to criticize him about but one that stands out and has great implications is the Global Poverty Act Obama supports.


Barack Obama's Global Tax Proposal Up for Senate Vote
By Cliff Kincaid
Feb 12, 2008
...A release from the Obama Senate office about the bill declares, “In 2000, the U.S. joined more than 180 countries at the United Nations Millennium Summit and vowed to reduce global poverty by 2015. We are halfway towards this deadline, and it is time the United States makes it a priority of our foreign policy to meet this goal and help those who are struggling day to day.”

The legislation itself requires the President “to develop and implement a comprehensive strategy to further the United States foreign policy objective of promoting the reduction of global poverty, the elimination of extreme global poverty, and the achievement of the Millennium Development Goal of reducing by one-half the proportion of people worldwide, between 1990 and 2015, who live on less than $1 per day.”

The bill defines the term “Millennium Development Goals” as the goals set out in the United Nations Millennium Declaration, General Assembly Resolution 55/2 (2000).

The U.N. says that “The commitment to provide 0.7% of gross national product (GNP) as official development assistance was first made 35 years ago in a General Assembly resolution, but it has been reaffirmed repeatedly over the years, including at the 2002 global Financing for Development conference in Monterrey, Mexico. However, in 2004, total aid from the industrialized countries totaled just $78.6 billion—or about 0.25% of their collective GNP.”

In addition to seeking to eradicate poverty, that declaration commits nations to banning “small arms and light weapons” and ratifying a series of treaties, including the International Criminal Court Treaty, the Kyoto Protocol (global warming treaty), the Convention on Biological Diversity, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, and the Convention on the Rights of the Child.

The Millennium Declaration also affirms the U.N. as “the indispensable common house of the entire human family, through which we will seek to realize our universal aspirations for peace, cooperation and development.”

Jeffrey Sachs, who runs the U.N.’s “Millennium Project,” says that the U.N. plan to force the U.S. to pay 0.7 percent of GNP in increased foreign aid spending would add $65 billion a year to what the U.S. already spends. Over a 13-year period, from 2002, when the U.N.’s Financing for Development conference was held, to the target year of 2015, when the U.S. is expected to meet the “Millennium Development Goals,” this amounts to $845 billion. And the only way to raise that kind of money, Sachs has written, is through a global tax, preferably on carbon-emitting fossil fuels.

Obama’s bill has only six co-sponsors. They are Senators Maria Cantwell, Dianne Feinstein, Richard Lugar, Richard Durbin, Chuck Hagel and Robert Menendez. But it appears that Biden and Obama see passage of this bill as a way to highlight Democratic Party priorities in the Senate.

The House version (H.R. 1302), sponsored by Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash.), had only 84 co-sponsors before it was suddenly brought up on the House floor last September 25 and was passed by voice vote. House Republicans were caught off-guard, unaware that the pro-U.N. measure committed the U.S. to spending hundreds of billions of dollars.

http://www.nationalledger.com/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi?archive=22&num=18845


Just to get your attention, it INCLUDES PROVISIONS TO BAN ALL SMALL ARMS AND LIGHT WEAPONS!

Further, it would FORCE the United States to give 7/10ths of one percent of our ENTIRE Gross Domestic Product to the UNITED NATIONS, so that THEY could give it out to the "poor" in OTHER nations. WE no longer would have a say in how much foreign aid we GIVE.

That's nearly 900 BILLION DOLLARS IN FOREIGN AID OVER a 13 year period!

Further, it would force the United States to sign the Kyoto Protocol.

http://www.un.org/millennium/declaration/ares552e.pdf

http://www.migunowners.org/forum/showthread.php?t=24134


Dan... Quote:
Originally Posted by Cherokee
Now I see what has happened. From the UN's Millennium Declaration. And I quote, from page 3: http://www.un.org/millennium/declaration/ares552e.pdf
Not that the Bill has anything to do with the Millenium Declaration, in of itself.

Now I see where the alarm is coming from on this.

The goals of the UN are to disarm the citizenry. We all know that. The alarm against the UN is for a good reason and even the NRA gets that. I'm not paranoid of the UN, but it's good to keep an eye on them in the distance and watch the small arms conferences.

This bill expresses support of the UN goals, and that's the reason for the alarm. The bill's sponsor is a gun grabber adding to the alarm. This bill does not adopt those goals in a contractual sense. It just spends a lot of tax money. It's a bad bill by a gun grabber supporting an organization that supports gun grabs, but not a gun grabbing bill in that sense...

http://www.migunowners.org/forum/showthread.php?t=24134


Conservative blogs, talk shows attack world-poverty bill — and Obama
By Les Blumenthal | McClatchy Newspapers
Posted on Wednesday, February 20, 2008 email | print tool nameclose
tool goes here
WASHINGTON — It isn't a high-profile bill, but the Global Poverty Act has lit up the conservative blogosphere, and even Rush Limbaugh has gotten into the act.

Quietly approved by the House of Representatives last fall with bipartisan support, the bill, sponsored by Rep. Adam Smith, D-Wash., would require the president to develop and implement a comprehensive strategy to help reduce extreme global poverty.

Conservative critics, including Limbaugh, Tony Perkins — who heads the Family Research Council — and others, claim that the measure would cost U.S. taxpayers $845 billion over the next dozen or so years. They also charge that it would tie the United States to the United Nations Millennium Declaration, which, among others things, calls for banning "small arms and light weapons" and ratifying the Kyoto global-warming treaty, the International Criminal Court Treaty and the Convention on Biological Diversity.

They've sought to tie the legislation to much broader goals promoted by the United Nations, including that nations spend 0.7 percent of their gross national product on eradicating poverty and providing other assistance to the world's poor.

Smith says there's no link and points out that there's no additional spending mandated in his bill.

He said the attacks weren't aimed at him but at Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama, whom he recruited last year to be the bill's chief Senate sponsor. Smith is the chairman of the Obama campaign in Washington state.

Limbaugh, according to a transcript of his radio show, last week called the bill an effort to "soak U.S. taxpayers again to fund global, liberal feel-good garbage."

Smith said he wasn't surprised that his bill had come under attack.

"Anything can happen in the blogosphere," he said. He denies that his bill would have the dire consequences Limbaugh and others claim it would.

"It doesn't do any of those things," Smith said. But he said it was time for the United States to take an aggressive role in helping the 1 billion people worldwide who lived on less than $1 a day.

The dustup began last week when Cliff Kincaid, a columnist for Accuracy in Media (www.aim.org), a conservative news-media watchdog organization, dismissed the bill and linked it to an effort by Democrats to burnish Obama's legislative credentials. His original column was widely distributed on Web sites ranging from www.fishingbuddy.com to www.capitolhillcoffeehouse.com.

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/homepage/story/28265.html


United Nations Association of the USA (UNA-USA)
Better World Campaign (BWC)
2008 Presidential Candidate Questionnaire
on US-UN Relations

Response from Barack Obama

4. Climate Change

Anthropogenic climate change is the most far-reaching environmental challenge facing the international community, requiring diplomatic, economic, scientific and technological cooperation. The United Nations can provide the most effective platform for much of this cooperation. Under the framework of the United Nations, the international community is beginning the process of drafting a successor agreement to the Kyoto Protocol on climate change, which expires in 2012. The goal of these negotiations will be the establishment of a comprehensive international agreement for preventing catastrophic climate change.

Do you support development of a post-2012 framework for addressing climate change under the auspices of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change? What steps will you take to help foster international cooperation to combat climate change?



I strongly support the development of a post-2012 global framework for addressing climate change, and will reverse the Bush administration’s intransigent rejection of binding emissions targets – a rejection that almost derailed the first round of negotiations last December in Bali under the framework convention. I have pledged to create a cap on carbon emissions in the United States designed to reduce our emissions by 80% from 1990 levels by the year 2050. I will also press other key countries to implement commensurate measures to reduce global greenhouse gas emissions.

I have called for the creation of a new Global Energy Forum of the world’s largest greenhouse gas emitters. We cannot ignore the developing countries that are being worst affected by climate change and force them to tackle adaptation on their own. To that end, I will call on the Global Energy Forum to launch the Global Energy and Environment (GEE) Initiative to bring developing countries into the global effort to develop alternative sources of energy and prepare for the ravages of a changing climate. GEE will help build the capacity of the developing world to participate profitably in the global carbon market, promote the transfer of viable and affordable technologies, and ensure that a substantial portion of increased research and development funds is allocated to technology adaptation appropriate to the poorest countries.

I will incorporate climate change and energy development goals into all tools of U.S. economic engagement, including assistance programs, trade agreements, and debt relief initiatives and help developing countries prepare for climate change by spurring the development of an open-source, real time mapping system to forecast the impacts of climate change country-by country. An Obama administration will also create an

Emerging Market Energy Fund, using USG funding to leverage the investment and venture capital needed to expand the developing world’s renewable energy portfolio.

http://www.unausa.org/site/pp.asp?c=fvKRI8MPJpF&b=3879851

Stuck With United Nations?

We're not gonna get out of it, says Charles Krauthammer ... on Fox News with Brit Hume, referencing the United Nations...

Columns

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/charleskrauthammer/archive.shtml

Global Warming dimming

Roger Pielke,Jr. report in National Hazards Review, mentioned by Brit Hume...

The Cloth of Science: an Interview with Roger Pielke, Jr.
"Instead of battles over morals or politics, we battle over science"

http://www.thebreakthrough.org/blog/2008/03/the_cloth_of_science_an_interv.shtml

Don't miss

... 4 videos from KUSI on youtube. The founder of The Weather Channel speaks out against global warming Part I, Part II, Part III, Part IV.

http://www.icecap.us/

don't miss

http://meteo.lcd.lu/globalwarming/

good reading

http://agw-heretic.blogspot.com/

Global warming: Just deal with it, some scientists say
template_bas
template_bas
The 'non-skeptic heretic club' says it would be easier and cheaper to adapt than fight climate change. Critics say the flaw in the theory is that the effects will be unpredictable.
By Alan Zarembo, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
March 26, 2008
The disastrous hurricanes of recent years have become the poster children of global warming.

But Roger A. Pielke Jr., an environmental policy expert at the University of Colorado at Boulder, wondered whether the billions of dollars of damage was caused by more intense storms or more coastal development.

After analyzing decades of hurricane data, Pielke concluded that rising levels of carbon dioxide had little to do with hurricane damage. Rather, it boiled down to a simple equation: Build more, lose more.

"Everything has been put on the back of carbon dioxide, and carbon dioxide cannot carry that weight," he said.

Pielke's analysis, published last month in the journal Natural Hazards Review, is part of a controversial movement that argues global warming over the rest of this century will play a much smaller role in unleashing planetary havoc than most scientists think.

His research has led him to believe that it is cheaper and more effective to adapt to global warming than to fight it.

Instead of spending trillions of dollars to stabilize carbon dioxide levels across the planet -- an enormously complex and expensive proposition -- the world could work on reducing hunger, storm damage and disease now, thereby neutralizing some of the most feared future problems of global warming.

http://www.latimes.com/news/science/la-sci-adapt26mar26,0,4227673.story


Related

Observed Climate Change, Negligible Global Effect of Greenhouse-gas Emission Limits in S. Carolina
Written by Robert Ferguson
Tuesday, 18 March 2008


http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/originals/south_carolina_negligible_climate_effect.html

Superdelegates Own Primary Favored to Thwart Back-Room Deal Charges

Update April 6, 2008

PA superdelegate T. J. Rooney supports a rotating national primary election for President in future contests.

7:00 p.m. - "On The Issues" - Guest, TJ Rooney, Chair of PA Democratic Party and Superdelegate committed to Sen. Hillary Clinton

http://www.pcntv.com/


At the end of the PCNTV interview with Host , Ben Bova, Rooney answered a question about the process of choosing a party nominee. Rooney suggested the rotating national Primary apparantly, among regions of the country...

It appears this is the plan Rooney may support above others.

Rotating Primary Plan

http://www.fairvote.org/?page=2084

March 20 Post

CNN's Wolf Blitzer interviews Governor about a plan he's proposed for a 'superdelegate' Primary to be held sometime in June prior to the Democrats' convention in August.

CNN Political Ticker

March 20, 2008
Tennessee governor proposes 'superdelegate primary'

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/20/tennessee-governor-proposes-superdelegate-primary/

Bredesen suggests way for Dems to pick nominee
He says superdelegate primary would help party chances in Nov.
By ERIK SCHELZIG, Associated Press
Thursday, March 20, 2008

http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2008/mar/20/bredesen-suggests-way-for-dems-to-pick-nominee/

Pennsylvania Discussion Superdelegates

DU

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=175x13575

Search fix the primaries regions

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=+fix+the+primaries+regions&btnG=Search

North American Union-ites

Robert A. Pastor father of North American Union

Meet Robert Pastor: Father of the North American Union
by Jerome R. Corsi Posted: 07/25/2006

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=16189

Internet Addiction Compulsive Impulsive Disorder Recognition

Discussed with a guest on Fox News America's Newsroom

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&ct=result&cd=1&q=computer+use+texting+mental+illness&spell=1

E-mailing, Texting Excessively? You May Be Mentally Ill
Tuesday, March 25, 2008

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,341434,00.html

Recognize Internet addiction as a mental illness, MD urges
Users experience cravings, withdrawal, psychiatrist says
Sharon Kirkey, The Ottawa Citizen
Published: Monday, March 17, 2008
Compulsive e-mailing and text messaging could soon become classified as an official brain illness.

An editorial in this month's issue of the American Journal of Psychiatry says Internet addiction -- including "excessive gaming, sexual pre-occupations and e-mail/text messaging" -- is a common compulsive-impulsive disorder that should be added to psychiatry's official guidebook of mental disorders.

Like other addicts, users experience cravings, urges, withdrawal and tolerance, requiring more and better equipment and software, or more and more hours online, according to Dr. Jerald Block, a psychiatrist at the Oregon Health and Science University in Portland. Dr. Block says people can lose all track of time or neglect "basic drives," like eating or sleeping. Relapse rates are high, he writes, and some people may need psychoactive medications or hospitalization.

Dr. Block says about 86 per cent of Internet addicts have some other form of mental illness, but that unless a therapist is looking for it, Internet addiction is likely to be missed.

He argues that the phenomenon warrants being included in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, psychiatry's official dictionary of mental illnesses. The next edition is due out in 2012. A draft is expected to be available for public comment next year.

But some say the research into Internet addiction is in its infancy and they wonder how doctors decide when computer use crosses the line from the normal to the pathological.


http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/story.html?id=705d2e4e-420f-4555-82ac-285b73d74d96&k=37204

SPCA Influenced by Trial Lawyers Not Humane Mandate

Appearing on Fox News this morning, Newsroom with Bill Hemmer and Megyn Kelly, Rogier van Bakel relates the sad story of how the SPCA denied his family the opportunity to adopt a dog, named Baxter, because the couple had two children in the home. Mr. Bakel slams the SPCA for:

letting trial lawyers run their business... a litigious society... denied adoption... put animal to sleep, to protect their own behinds... a bigger problem for the SPCA, institutional behaviour on part of SPCA...

References, Salon.com article on treatment of animals

Rogier's blog

The Nannies of the SPCA

http://www.bakelblog.com/nobodys_business/2007/05/the_nannies_of_.html

Read more from Bakel's Blog

ASPCA: Dead Dogs Maybe Better Than Live Ones

...I thought that my local SPCA was accidentally staffed with petty, arrogant know-it-alls — that this was a fluke, not a nationwide institutional attitude.

Now I'm not so sure...

http://www.bakelblog.com/nobodys_business/2008/03/aspca-dead-dogs.html

Leeches Do Not Detoxify the Body

They are FDA approved for certain uses.

It doesn't detoxify the body, says medical expert, Dr. Marc Siegel, interviewed on Fox News.

http://www.doctorsiegel.com/

Demi Moore appearance on David Letterman

Demi Moore Uses Leeches to 'Cleanse' and 'Detoxify'
Wednesday, March 26, 2008

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,341629,00.html

Video
Published in March 25th, 2008

http://www.poplife.biz/?p=52723

Carter Baker Commission Election Reform Revisited

The Carter/Baker Commission was somewhat of a start in our day and time to address inherently built-in systemattic problems in our election system.

Among its members were those who were by their occupations supposed to be able to be sterlingly impartial. University professors and scholars were among the mix.

The disturbing aspect to the commission's recommendations was the partisan flak the commission received from its recommendation for a voter identification system. One has to wonder whether charges the commission was itself partisan is coming more from opposition to the idea of the voter id than from the actuality of commission 'partisanship.'

The dissent to the commission's report and the commentary on the dissenter's website are to be taken as evidence of partisanship, not the other way around.

(Net the Truth Online)

http://www.carterbakerdissent.com/
Jimmy Carter & James Baker Co-Chair Commission on Federal Election Reform
David M Rosenberg rosenberg at MIT.EDU
Sun Mar 27 10:29:38 PST 2005

http://evote-mass.org/pipermail/evote-discussion_evote-mass.org/2005-March/000089.html


Christian Science Monitor
from the September 22, 2005 editionCarter-Baker Commission Report Imperiled by its Partisan Voter ID Mandate
Richard Hasen

http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0922/p09s01-coop.html


Spencer Overton, Commission member, dissenting views on the Carter-Baker Commission's photo ID proposal.

http://www.carterbakerdissent.com/dissent.php


Conference on Election Reform

http://www.princeton.edu/prior/publicatons/annual_reports/docs/2006.pdf

Robert A. Pastor
http://www.american.edu/ia/pdfs/pastorcv.pdf

Tuesday, March 25, 2008

Republicans Voter Fraud in Registering as Democrats?

As if... we don't have enough to investigate with actual election and voter fraud in the voter registration rolls of any state in the U.S.

Rush Limbaugh and Voter Fraud

http://news.aol.com/political-machine/2008/03/22/rush-limbaugh-and-voter-fraud/


Will Rush Limbaugh Be Indicted for Voter Fraud?

By Steven Rosenfeld, AlterNet. Posted March 21, 2008.

http://www.alternet.org/mediaculture/80392/?page=1


Ohio Republicans guilty of voter fraud?
By Chris - Posted on March 22nd, 2008
As the board of election in Cuyahoga County, Ohio, where Cleveland is located, launches an investigation into illegal crossover voting in the state's 2008 presidential primary, a big open question remains unanswered: Will county officials go after the ringleaders of apparently illegal electioneering where thousands of Republican voters swore -- under penalty of law -- allegiance to the Democratic Party in order to vote for Hillary Clinton?...

http://swampbubbles.com/ohio-republicans-guilty-voter-fraud

Monday, March 24, 2008

Trio Sings Star Spangled Banner Politically Correctly

Notice how the Jonas Brothers, singing the Star Spangled Banner, placed hands over hearts while a singin? The brothers were kicking off the White House annual Easter egg roll hunt.

President Bush stood behind in the dark. It remains unclear whether President and Mrs. Bush placed hands over hearts during the recital.

Full State Legislative Record Ignored in Article

Not surprisingly, there is no mention of state Rep. Peter J. Daley's co-sponsorship of legislation extending the state's Keystone Opportunity Zone program in the Herald-Standard article touting Daley's re-election quest:

Daley seeks 14th term in state legislature.

Guess he and others think that effort has just slipped under the radar of the local public.

Not here. We've focused on the tax-exemption program for quite a while now.

See our sidebar links to more info about this subject. Included in the material is a letter to state Representative Timothy Mahoney we've posted at Wake Up.

http://dirtline.tripod.com/wakeup

All of the incumbents seeking re-election and any challengers should be asked how they can support a tax forgiveness program that pits residential and business property owner against other property owners in the same county and town?

How can they justify even one house or business property going up for tax sale when others simply don't face that tax burden and the consequences for failure to pay (given hard times and continuing declining economic conditions)?

Each of them should have to face the public at these tax sales and actually pound the gavel themselves when the property is auctioned off for usually far below its actual value.

(Net the Truth Online)

Daley seeks 14th term in state legislature
By Christine Haines
Herald-Standard
03/24/2008
Updated 03/23/2008 09:15:18 PM EDT

Daley is chairman of the House Commerce Committee, which oversees legislation and regulations for banking and financial services, economic development programs, the state housing finance agency and the state Securities Commission. Daley said that in that post he has guided a series of comprehensive reforms of the mortgage industry, including the creation of mortgage rescue funds to help homeowners facing foreclosure on subprime loans.

Daley said he also secured $500 million in funding for the missing link of the Mon-Fayette Expressway during last summer's state budget talks, as well as funding to continue development of the alternative energy industry and advocacy for Clean Coal development. He is a founding member of the Pennsylvania Energy Development Authority.

He said he also created a tax credit program for stream improvements on farms and a jobs-related tax credit to lure the film industry to Pennsylvania. He also supported a new center for beef excellence being proposed for the Department of Agriculture.

http://www.heraldstandard.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=19417321&BRD=2280&PAG=461&dept_id=480247&rfi=6


Response

Daley co-sponsor tax exemptions for some in KOZ
Don't forget Rep. Daley is a co-sponsor of new legislation that extends the state's Keystone Opportunity Zones program. The bill got out of committee recently, and may be taken up by the House after the holiday recess.

March 12 – Moving rapidly on the governor’s economic stimulus strategy, state Rep. Peter J. Daley, D-Washington/Fayette, chairman of the House Commerce Committee and Rep. Dick Hess, R- Bedford, minority chairman, called an expedited meeting of the committee to extend the life of the state’s Keystone Opportunity Zone tax abatement law.

http://www.pahouse.com/pr/049031208.asp

It remains to be seen whether the legislation will pass unanimously in either the state House or Senate.

Meanwhile, residential and business property owners not located in a KOZ continue to face ever growing tax bills those with the KOZ designations don't have to pay up for some 7 to 10 years.

Taxpayers facing hard times and inability to pay face loss of home or business property in county tax sales.

Our tax dollars pay for state representatives to drive vehicles and eat at 5-star restaurants and relax at resort conferences along with some of the very people owning Fortune 500 companies and property receiving many of these tax exemptions and tax breaks.

How any of them can look us in the face when they return to their home districts, knowing property owners face tax burdens at threat of loss of home and business if they don't pay up is beyond comprehension.

They should all have to show up at the county tax claim sale and pound the gavel when such are sold for back taxes.

Notice when the KOZ extension bill comes to Fayette, if it isn't defeated in the General Assembly as it should be, who will line up to get the extensions. What excuse will be used for the failure to develop property already in the KOZs in the area for some 10 years already.

When is enough of these tax giveaways for some but not for all - enough?


Daley expedites governor's economic recovery plan

HARRISBURG, March 12 – Moving rapidly on the governor’s economic stimulus strategy, state Rep. Peter J. Daley, D-Washington/Fayette, chairman of the House Commerce Committee and Rep. Dick Hess, R- Bedford, minority chairman, called an expedited meeting of the committee to extend the life of the state’s Keystone Opportunity Zone tax abatement law.

Dennis Yablonsky, the state secretary of the Department of Community and Economic Development, told the committee that 11 substantial economic development projects statewide were awaiting word on whether the KOZ program would be extended for another 10 years. The Rendell administration is trying to fast track a variety of new or renewed economic incentives to counter the slowing national economy’s impact on the state.

“The current KOZs have created and retained thousands of jobs and attracted billions of dollars in capital investments, and the continuation of the program is critical to our ability to successfully compete for job-creating projects with other states,” Daley said. “This revision of the current program will be more appealing to businesses and continue to stimulate and revitalize communities while creating jobs.”

The committee today unanimously reported out H.B. 2297, introduced by Rep. Cherelle Parker, D-Phila. Both Daley and Hess signed on as co-sponsors of the bill, along with 17 members from both sides of the aisle. The bill proposes to extend, expand and modify the existing Keystone Opportunity Zone program.

"Although the KOZ program has been very successful in attracting businesses to deteriorated sites in our Commonwealth, there are still a number of unused sites that could be utilized to attract jobs to our communities,” Hess said. “This bill allows the Commonwealth to focus on our unused sites if they need more time to attract development, and switch sites that are unlikely to attract business for new and more promising sites. I appreciate the opportunity I had to work with Chairman Daley on this important legislation."

The first part of the proposed legislation would authorize local municipalities and school districts to extend expiration dates of existing undeveloped property within KOZs. It would allow a local option to choose a seven-year extension for the subzone or grant a seven-year extension in which zone benefits would not accrue until a company locates within the zone, at which point zone benefits would be in effect for 10 years from the dates of occupancy.

The bill also would eliminate the sales factor from the KOZ apportionment formula. Since most sales from facilities in a KOZ are to customers not likely to be in a KOZ, current law unintentionally reduces the overall KOZ corporate tax advantage. This revision would improve the fairness and attractiveness of the program.

Parker’s bill also would authorize the swap of less developable properties within a zone and permit counties with no existing subzones to designate, with approval of local government and school districts, the designation of up to 300 acres of new subzones. Seven counties that have never participated would be permitted to designate a KOZ.

The last portion of the bill would grant the Sales and Use Tax exception for all building materials used in a KOZ. This revision would expand the sales tax exemption for building machinery and equipment to include construction materials used to construct a qualified building within a KOZ

The bill now goes to the full House for consideration.

http://www.pahouse.com/pr/049031208.asp

Fox Rewrites Barack Obama typical White People Comment

Fox 'n Friends attempt to rewrite history. The threesome replayed their pre-weekend episode wherein Brian Kilmeade walked off the set. We didn't mention that part of the Fox episodic TV last Friday, but other blogs did, including the couple we linked in our earlier post.

We focused not on Kilmeade's antics, whatever they were about.

Our focus was the comments of well-respected and award-winning journalist, Chris Wallace's chastisement of the trio's earlier morning segments which focused on Barack Obama and his comment "typical white people" almost exclusively.

We linked to the site newsbuster which claims "we watch Fox so you don't have to."

We linked to the Huffington Post because the HP additionally included hundreds of comments.

This morning, Gretchen attempted to again twist Obama's words and Kilmeade attempted to continue to set her straight, in his own way.

But hey, watch it all for yourself on youtube...

Sunday, March 23, 2008

Cooling Globe Gets Cold Shoulder

Climate facts to warm to
Christopher Pearson | March 22, 2008
CATASTROPHIC predictions of global warming usually conjure with the notion of a tipping point, a point of no return.

Last Monday - on ABC Radio National, of all places - there was a tipping point of a different kind in the debate on climate change. It was a remarkable interview involving the co-host of Counterpoint, Michael Duffy and Jennifer Marohasy, a biologist and senior fellow of Melbourne-based think tank the Institute of Public Affairs. Anyone in public life who takes a position on the greenhouse gas hypothesis will ignore it at their peril.
Duffy asked Marohasy: "Is the Earth stillwarming?"

She replied: "No, actually, there has been cooling, if you take 1998 as your point of reference. If you take 2002 as your point of reference, then temperatures have plateaued. This is certainly not what you'd expect if carbon dioxide is driving temperature because carbon dioxide levels have been increasing but temperatures have actually been coming down over the last 10 years."

Duffy: "Is this a matter of any controversy?"

Marohasy: "Actually, no. The head of the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) has actually acknowledged it. He talks about the apparent plateau in temperatures so far this century. So he recognises that in this century, over the past eight years, temperatures have plateaued ... This is not what you'd expect, as I said, because if carbon dioxide is driving temperature then you'd expect that, given carbon dioxide levels have been continuing to increase, temperatures should be going up ... So (it's) very unexpected, not something that's being discussed. It should be being discussed, though, because it's very significant."

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,23411799-7583,00.html

PA Gov and NM Gov pol-polls

On Fox News Sunday, Governor Ed Rendell (a Clinton supporter and superdelegate) cited national polling of USA TODAY and Rasmussen he claims put Hillary Clinton is ahead of Barack Obama nationally in the polling.

Gov. Richardson (recently endorsed Obama) attempted to set the record straight, but it was the end of the segment. Chris Wallace interrupted Richardson before he could cite the equally current Gallup poll.

Even USA TODAY includes the updated stats from the Gallup polling, however the short report additionally notes

.. The Gallup tracking poll is based on interviews with 1,264 Democratic or Democrat-leaning voters March 19-21. Its margin of error is +/-3 percentage points.

A tracking poll by Rasmussen Reports has shown a different trajectory. In that poll, Obama clung to leads of 1 to 5 percentage points all week and fell behind Clinton for the first time today, 46%-44%. Rasmussen calculations are based on four nights of polling, compared to Gallup's three.

http://blogs.usatoday.com/onpolitics/2008/03/gallup-obama-re.html?csp=34


March 22, 2008
Gallup Daily: Obama Edges Ahead of ClintonDemocratic nomination preference: Obama 48%, Clinton 45%

http://www.gallup.com/poll/105529/Gallup-Daily-Obama-Edges-Ahead-Clinton.aspx

Comparison of poll results

http://www.pollingreport.com/wh08dem.htm

Saturday, March 22, 2008
Nationally, Hillary Clinton now holds a very slight advantage over Barack Obama, 46% to 44%...

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/daily_presidential_tracking_poll



USA TODAY

Gallup: Obama recaptures edge over Clinton
Gallup reports: Barack Obama has quickly made up the deficit he faced with Hillary Clinton earlier this week, with the latest Gallup Poll Daily tracking update on Democratic presidential nomination preferences showing 48% of Democratic voters favoring Obama and 45% Clinton.

Obama fell behind Clinton on March 14 and stayed there until today. "Obama's campaign clearly suffered in recent days from negative press, mostly centering around his association with the controversial Rev. Jeremiah Wright," wrote Gallup analyst Jeff Jones. "But Obama has now edged back ahead of Clinton due to a strong showing for him in Friday night's polling, perhaps in response to the endorsement he received from well-respected New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson."

http://blogs.usatoday.com/onpolitics/2008/03/gallup-obama-re.html?csp=34


March, 2008 Scientific American

Super Tuesday: Markets Predict Outcome Better Than Polls
Internet-based financial markets appear to forecast elections better than polls do. They also probe how well the next George Clooney drama will do at the box office and how bad the next flu season will be.

http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=markets-predict-outcome-better-than-polls

News Light

Good post at War in Context

Words in context
By Paul Woodward, War in Context, March 21, 2008


...Taken literally, that’s indisputable. We’re the ones who get to decide how we vote. Yet what Klein does — what everyone in the media does when their preeminent loyalty attaches to their paycheck — is to refuse to point a spotlight on the individuals who shape the news from the shadows.

In every single newsroom on every single day, commercial and political decisions are being made while cloaked under the pretense that events themselves are the overwhelming force that steers editorial judgment. But consider how little we actually know about the decision-making process that triggered what has become the most explosive story in the presidential campaign.

On Good Morning America on March 13, Brian Ross with the stealth of a terrorist who is just about to set off a bomb, uttered these seemingly innocent words: “… an ABC News review of more than a dozen sermons… ” — and we all know what followed.

What we don’t know, but what could be as illuminating as the DVDs themselves, is what led ABC News to be conducting a review of Rev Jeremiah Wright’s sermons in the first place...

...So, while every cable news channel has followed ABC News‘ lead and made Rev Wright campaign issue #1, no one has been pressing the ABC News investigative team to explain how exactly it came to set the political agenda.

Was the Good Morning America story the fruit of a tenacious piece of investigative journalism, or might it on the contrary have been an altogether lazy piece of journalism — a case of someone saying, “Here’s the ammo. All you need to do is load and fire”?

When news isn’t new then this issue of timing means that newsmaking is taking place inside the newsroom. The media has become manufacturer. Might we be allowed to become privy to the process?

For instance, it’s obvious why the ABC News editors would deem a line such as “America’s chickens are coming home to roost” as newsworthy. But how did they decide that most of what came immediately after that line was irrelevant. Would most Americans not have responded in a different way if they had then heard Wright say:

See clip

...Rev Wright was telling his congregation, pay attention to this white man, Edward Peck. It’s worth listening to what he has to say. It’s worth taking into consideration the opinion of a man who had been the Deputy Director of the White House Task Force on Terrorism under President Ronald Reagan, former Deputy Coordinator, Covert Intelligence Programs at the State Department, U.S. Ambassador and Chief of Mission to Iraq (1977-1980), and a 32-year veteran of the Foreign Service. At least, as far as Rev Wright was concerned, Edward Peck was worth listening to and that’s what he told his congregation.

On October 8, 2001, on CNN, Peck was asked: “Wouldn’t this war against terrorism be a mistake if we stop at Osama bin Laden and don’t take out Saddam Hussein as well?”

Peck said it would not be a mistake because, “when you take out Saddam Hussein, the key question you have to ask then is, what happens after that? And we don’t have a clue. Nobody knows, but it’s probably going to be bad. And a lot of people are going to be very upset about that, because that really is not written into our role in this world is to decide who rules Iraq.”

Rev Wright suggested that “in the wake of the American tragedy” of 9/11, in a process of self-examination, it would really be in America’s interests to listen to people such as Edward Peck. ABC News and much of the rest of the media would rather that we pay attention to a few ill-chosen phrases...

http://warincontext.org/2008/03/21/campaign-08-editorial-with-attention-to-the-unseen/

Obama New Pastor Sermon How to Handle Public Lynching

Fox News reporting with video chicago's Trinity United Church of Christ service includes the sermon of the Rev. Moss How to Handle a Public Lynching

Live and streaming webcast video

Trinity United Church of Christ

Sunday 7:30 a.m. CST, 11:00 a.m. CST and 6:00 p.m. CST

http://www.tucc.org/home.htm


Andrew Sullivan posted the entirety of Jeremiah Wright Sermon "Audacity of Hope":

http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/03/for-the-record.html

Pennsylvania Not Over Yet Obama Edges Ahead of Clinton

Just when almost everybody thought Barack Obama had the worst week or two of his campaign, the slight lead Clinton gained nationally has been reversed...

Maybe people are reading Hillary Clinton's book It Takes a Village (that was ghostwritten), and Barack Obama's book, The Audacity of Hope (which according to Obama, he was inspired to write after listening to a sermon of the Rev. Jeremiah Wright).

Makes one wonder which is the candidate the people 'trust,' more than the other, or the other...

(Net the Truth Online)

Perceived Honesty Gap for Clinton Versus Obama, McCain

http://www.gallup.com/poll/105097/Perceived-Honesty-Gap-Clinton-Versus-Obama-McCain.aspx

March 22, 2008
Gallup Daily: Obama Edges Ahead of ClintonDemocratic nomination preference: Obama 48%, Clinton 45%

http://www.gallup.com/poll/105529/Gallup-Daily-Obama-Edges-Ahead-Clinton.aspx


Celebrities stump for Obama at Pitt
By Jason Cato
TRIBUNE-REVIEW
Sunday, March 23, 2008

http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/breaking/s_558655.html

Saturday, March 22, 2008

Obama: Can't Back Off U.S. Committment Human Rights

Friday Press Conference, Barack Obama took a number of 'decent' questions, finally, from the mainstream press.

The last question redeemed a Press that apparantly is salivating over the comments and views of a man who is not running for President, Rev. Jerimiah Wright.

We suggest Wright write a book specifically about the historical aspects of each of his scurrilous comments.

Quickly, before November.

During the Press Conference, Obama stood his ground he didn't hear Wright specifically comment 'AIDS manmade by government..." or "Goddam, America"

(Isn't his why Obama didn't say at the end of his A More Perfect Union "race" speech, "God Bless America? When you think of it, people listening with one viewpoint or another may go into mass hysteria after listening to Sean Hannity and believe Obama said under his breath, "Goddump, America and Sean Hannity and Lou Dobbs...")

Obama relayed he did hear a 9/11 comment - indicating something along those lines was made during an "Audacity of Hope" speech Wright gave. That speech formed the basis for some of the comments Obama made in his first book, and provided the title of his book the AUDACITY OF HOPE.

We would all do well to read both to determine how Obama was influenced by Wright's speech.

Obama however should be much more clear about what he did hear, and when. We don't need a clever politician running the country, we need somebody who can stand honestly for whatever he, or she, stands for...

(Net the Truth ONline)

BALLOT BOWL 2008
• Richardson Endorses Obama
• Candidates' Passport Files Breached; Richardson Endorses Obama
• Extreme Weather, Flooding Continues in Midwest; Operation Boot Camp Pushes you to Your Limit; Did Obama's Speech Repair Damage of Pastor's Speech; CNN Hero helps Others Get Jobs.


http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/2008.03.22.html


Don't miss

Campaign News; Declining Industrial Base; Outsourcing National Defense

Aired March 22, 2008 - 19:00 ET

LOU DOBBS, HOST: Tonight: Senator Obama tries to shift the campaign agenda away from the outrage over his controversial former pastor. We'll have complete coverage.
And: Rising concerns about our declining industrial base and the outsourcing of our national security. We'll have that special report: War on the Middle Class.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0803/22/ldtw.01.html



See our previous posts

Friday, March 14, 2008
Barack Obama Faces Destiny American Style

http://netthetruthonline.blogspot.com/2008/03/barack-obama-faces-destiny-american.html

Barack Obama Interviewed by Fox Major Garrett

http://netthetruthonline.blogspot.com/2008/03/barack-obama-interviewed-by-fox-major.html

Barack Obama Pastor Explained Church Philosophy on Fox Hannity & Colmes

http://netthetruthonline.blogspot.com/2008/03/barack-obama-pastor-explained-church.html

Obama Truth: Sourcewatch Distorts Pre-Campaign Actions?

http://netthetruthonline.blogspot.com/2008/03/obama-truth-sourcewatch-distorts-pre.html

Media Truth: Psychological Warfare Played

http://netthetruthonline.blogspot.com/2008/03/media-truth-psychological-warfare.html

Obama Truth: Flimsy Defense Not in Pew During Controversial Comments Challenged

http://netthetruthonline.blogspot.com/2008/03/obama-truth-flimsy-defense-not-in-pew.html

Newsmax Correspondent Can't Give Date Obama Attended Pastor's Incendiary Sermon

http://netthetruthonline.blogspot.com/2008/03/newsmax-correspondent-cant-give-date.html

Monday, March 17, 2008
Barack Obama Interview on Eve of Speech About Race

http://netthetruthonline.blogspot.com/2008/03/barack-obama-interview-on-eve-of-speech.html

March 18, 2008
Barack Obama Lapel Pin Missing During Speech Fodder for Conservatives

http://netthetruthonline.blogspot.com/2008/03/barack-obama-lapel-pin-missing-during.html

March 18, 2008
Barack Obama Speech Either Or Option

http://netthetruthonline.blogspot.com/2008/03/barack-obama-speech-either-or-option.html

March 18, 2008
Obama Speech : America's Knife: New Sculpture Could Emerge

http://netthetruthonline.blogspot.com/2008/03/obama-speech-americas-knife-new.html

March 18, 2008
Silence Deafening Lack Nonstop News Obama Speech Clips

http://netthetruthonline.blogspot.com/2008/03/silence-deafening-lack-nonstop-news.html

March 18, 2008
News & Opinion Coverage Obama Speech

http://netthetruthonline.blogspot.com/2008/03/news-opinion-coverage-obama-speech.html

March 18, 2008
Monday Poll: Obama Preference by Majority Democrats

http://netthetruthonline.blogspot.com/2008/03/monday-poll-obama-preference-by.html

March 21, 2008
Barack Obama: Once in a Lifetime Leader

http://netthetruthonline.blogspot.com/2008/03/barack-obama-once-in-lifetime-leader.html

March 21, 2008
Chris Wallace: Fox Fight?

http://netthetruthonline.blogspot.com/2008/03/chris-wallace-fox-fight.html





(Net the Truth Online)

Francis Schaeffer's son: Dad 'worse' than Obama's pastor
Charges black minister's 'anti-America' rhetoric mild by comparison
Posted: March 21, 2008 11:41 pm Eastern
By Art Moore WorldNetDaily

The anti-America rhetoric of Barack Obama's Chicago pastor is mild in comparison to pronouncements made by Francis Schaffer in the 1970s and 1980s, charges the late evangelical thinker's son.

Frank Schaeffer, who has written a book distancing himself from his evangelical roots, asserts in a newspaper column that Obama has been unfairly "smeared" by his association with Rev. Jeremiah Wright Jr., the Illinois senator's self-described spiritual mentor and moral compass.

Schaeffer, writing in the Baltimore Community Times, charges "the far-right Republicans and the stop-at-nothing Clintons are using the 'scandal' of Obama's preacher to undermine the first black American candidate with a serious shot at the presidency."

"Every Sunday thousands of right-wing white preachers (following in my father's footsteps) rail against America's sins from tens of thousands of pulpits," Schaeffer writes. "They tell us that America is complicit in the 'murder of the unborn,' has become 'Sodom' by coddling gays, and that our public schools are sinful places full of evolutionists and sex educators hell-bent on corrupting children."

In his column, Frank Schaeffer, meanwhile, argued "right-wing preachers" say, "as my dad often did, that we are, 'under the judgment of God.' They call America evil and warn of imminent destruction. By comparison Obama's minister's shouted 'controversial' comments were mild.


Frank Schaeffer

"All [Wright] said was that God should damn America for our racism and violence and that no one had ever used the N-word about Hillary Clinton," says Schaeffer, a convert to the Eastern Orthodox Church in 1990.

He argues that "while Dad and I crisscrossed America denouncing our nation's sins, instead of getting in trouble we became darlings of the Republican Party."

"We were rewarded for our 'stand' by people such as Congressman Jack Kemp, the Fords, Reagan and the Bush family," Schaeffer writes. "The top Republican leadership depended on preachers and agitators like us to energize their rank and file. No one called us un-American."

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=59599


Double standard on Obama, preachers
FRANK SCHAEFFER 19.MAR.08

When Sen. Obama’s preacher thundered about racism and injustice, Obama suffered smear-by-association. But when my late father - religious right leader Francis Schaeffer denounced America and even called for the violent overthrow of the U.S. government, he was invited to lunch with presidents Ford, Reagan and Bush Sr.

http://www.communitytimes.com/default.asp?sourceid=&smenu=67&twindow=Default&mad=No&sdetail=5928&wpage=1&skeyword=&sidate=&ccat=&ccatm=&restate=&restatus=&reoption=&retype=&repmin=&repmax=&rebed=&rebath=&subname=&pform=&sc=1049&hn=communitytimes&he=.com

Friday, March 21, 2008

Fox Susan Estrich Asks Why Obama Stayed with Wright

On Fox's Hannity and Colmes tonight Susan Estrich (a Clinton supporter) asked Professor Eddie Glaude 'Why did Obama stay with Wright?'

http://www.google.com/search?q=eddie+glaude&btnG=Search&hl=en

Searching for clip of the program. Glaude gave an adequate answer.

Estrich then interviewed author of The Liberal Mind Dr. Lyle Rossiter... liberal mind irrational very destructive to our culture... he finally told Hannity at the end of the segment.

More tomorrow

Global Warming Bubble

Junk Science: The Global Warming Bubble
Thursday, March 20, 2008

By Steven Milloy
You didn’t have to be a rocket scientist in the 1990s to figure out that speculative investment in dot-coms with no revenues would be disastrous.

The same goes for lenders giving mortgages to borrowers with no jobs, no incomes and no assets.

So after surviving the tech bubble and while trying to extricate the economy from the housing bubble, why are we bent on heading into the global warming bubble?

Just this week the Environmental Protection Agency issued its economic analysis of the Lieberman-Warner global warming bill that is being considered by the Senate. The EPA projects that if the bill is enacted the size of our economy as measured by its gross domestic product would shrink by as much as $2.9 trillion by the year 2050.

That’s a 6.9 percent smaller economy than we otherwise might have if no action were taken to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. For an idea of what that might mean, consider our current economic crisis.

During the fourth quarter of 2007, GDP actually increased by 0.6 percent, yet trepidation still spread among businesses, consumers and the financial markets. Though the EPA says that Lieberman-Warner would send our economy in the opposite direction by more than a factor of 10, few in Congress seem concerned.

For more perspective, consider that during 1929 and 1930, the first two years of the Great Depression, GDP declined by 8.6 percent and 6.4 percent, respectively. And what would we get for such a massive self-inflicted wound? It ought to be something that is climatically spectacular, right? You be the judge.

The EPA says that by the year 2095 — 45 years after GDP has been slashed by 6.9 percent — atmospheric carbon dioxide levels would be 25 parts per million lower than if no greenhouse gas regulation were implemented.

Keeping in mind that the current atmospheric CO2 level is 380 ppm and the projected 2095 CO2 level is about 500 ppm, according to the EPA, what are the potential global temperature implications for such a slight change in atmospheric CO2 concentration?

Not much, as average global temperature would only be reduced by a maximum of about 0.10 to 0.20 degrees Celsius, according to existing research.

Sacrificing many trillions of dollars of GDP for a trivial, 45-year-delayed and merely hypothetical reduction in average global temperature must be considered as exponentially more asinine than the dot-bombs of the late-1990s and the NINJA subprime loans that we now look upon scornfully.

So who in their right mind would push for this

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,339831,00.html