And Obama says he doesn't know whether he is an 'official' member of the Council on Foreign Relations? He doesn't know? What do they just sign anybody up? Do they sign you on when you have a good chance of becoming elected President or before?
Worse, regarding the North American (Union) trans-intercontinental highway... running from Texas, across Texas, throughout the rest of the United States to who knows where, Obama says something like, with all due respect, this is the stuff people put on blogs... he doesn't think there is a conspiracy for a continental union...
Barack is asked about the CFR/NAU - Part 6 (3/31/08)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GbV8duHcXX0
Barack Obama asked if he and wife are members CFR
the unofficial loose transcript here explains the laughter
Loose Transcript of Barack Obama's Speech in Lancaster County on March 31, 2008
Page 2 By Justin Quinn, About.com
http://usconservatives.about.com/od/2008presidentialelection/a/ObamaLancaster_2.htm
Unofficial transcript by Net the Truth Online
Lancaster Pennsylvania Obama Speech clip Oct. 3/31
Obama asked about CFR and North American Union
Questioner thanked for honoring wishes of the people not taking lobbyists money... clap it's been reported you and your wife are in the globalist CFR which is the Council on Foreign Relations... like to know if that's true... and where you stand on the North American Union... been confirmed in the Press, Ron Paul spoke about it and Congress spent some money on it a union like european union and merging of money system known as the Amero what's your opinion... where do you stand
CFR don't know if I'm not, the council on foreing relations I don't know if I'm an official member... I've spoken... basically it's a forum where talk about foreign policy... no official membership that I'm aware of... no card that I'm aware of... (not audible)(laughter, even by questioner)... in terms of this North American Union I know Ron Paul has talked about have to say with all due respect see no evidence of this actually taking place, something that has been ginned up on certain blogs on the internet... a highway being built in Texas that will facilitate more transportation and travel through Mexico... and intercontinental United States and Canada people perceive there will be this Union... like North American Union there is no evidence this is taking place... NAFTA helped to break down barriers to trade between western countries... I was opposed to that... (clapping) but I don't think there's some conspiracy to create this one continental government...between United States Canada and Mexico, but... ok...
clip ends...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GbV8duHcXX0
Not a conspiracy? Well that might depend on what is the definition of an actual conspiracy versus a conspiracy theory vs a stated goal with ongoing activities some not expressly stated as leading to that stated goal.
there's a stated goal as long-noted and expressed for world union among independent nations. Everything else that happens is movement towards fulfilling that stated goal.
World Peace Through World Law. The book that states exactly what is afoot.
There's a stated purpose for North American borderless trade... no trade barriers... that's the idea...
Now there's also been discussion about a common currencey among nations of the world.
This is in fact a fact. The United Nations has pushed for just such a currency.
So will Obama put forth his public opposition to that United Nations goal?
One doesn't need to look exclusively to Ron Paul for commentary on the North American Union or pact that will undermine U.S. Sovereignty. In fact, we have been a bit wary of Paul because he was asked point blank his thoughts a on the summit of nation's leaders a while back and could have clarified exactly what is and has been happening.
Thursday, October 16, 2008
New World Financial Order
...'...or do you really suspect there is something bigger afoot here? Is there a conspiracy to take over all the banks?'
Paul answered, 'No. They just have a plan. They believe in socialism and I don't. But there is something very very big happening... end of a monetary system started in '71 ...allowed dollar to be king... everybody propping up the system...everybody holding dollars...
he's worried about this weekend where they're going to come up with a new idea 'they' might come up with one central bank for the world.
then he says... they build up the panic build up the fear TO DO TERRIBLE THINGS
they do it in foreign policy they do it after 9/11 to undermine our system to undermine our freedom. Now they're going to take over all private ownership...'
Really, that's not a conspiracy? they're meeting in secret, no media, no public access, and his words they build up the panic they build up the fear ... and walla they may even come up with a 'new idea' one central bank for the world?
http://netthetruthonline.blogspot.com/2008/10/new-world-financial-order.html
Ron Paul interview Fox News
http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/023456.html
Realize, any time there is an agreement, a pact, a contract between nations that isn't just an agreement that the United States can break lightly. though the Senate hasn't done its due diligence and gone the Constitutional route of ratifying international agreements and trade agreements as treaties, a much higher hurdle to pass, the agreements have the full backing of United States law.
They become part of the law of our land and there are fines and penalties for not abiding by the contracts.
That citizens of the United States and government entities have to follow agreements which should have been ratified as treaties to become the law of our land is proof enough of a conspiracy to undermine the sovereignty of the United States which Constitution sets specific limits on government and particularly engaging in foreign affairs of other nations.
We dismiss those which portray a Jewish conspiracy of world bankers and sift through to the more basic goal of a one-world global and financial/trade/economy/peaceful order. In fact, President George H.W. Bush used the term new world order which wasn't a gaffe. (It's also irksome to hear over and over how the United States is a 'democracy.' It's not, our form of government was founded as a Constitutional republic, not a democracy, and with a federal system and a democratic process of government and elections...)
Use of the phrasing new world order didn't start with George H. W. Bush. Obama will use care when crafting his words regarding NAFTA and international agreements, the bailout, etc. One day, somewhere along the way, though, listen for it.
We've already heard the echoes, if we'd only catch them into our consciousness.
Since use of that particular expression by George H.W. Bush was so recent, every citizen and youth of age should be fully aware of the implications of the term.
New World Order - through peace...
As we and others have pointed out in many different ways there is no difference between the two major political parties - the same coin different sides.
Once you tap into that thought process, you free yourself to notice everything these people say may be said slightly differently, with a different approach used to accomplish various outcomes, but the goal is the same. (A convoluted government bureaucracy that in the end serves only its own self perpetuation and growth. Eventually, we and others contend, the goal as outlined in the Charter of the United Nations, and subsequent books explaining such, plans for a world government. If you have time to read only one thick book for the next year make it World Peace Through World Law by Grenville Clark and Louis B. Sohn Harvard University Press 1958. Don't think every president of the United States has not read this book including George W. Bush (nuck-u-lar) and President-Elect Barack Obama (change we can believe in).
"The winds of change are with us now."
Guess who said that?
BARACK Obama declared yesterday "We have the righteous wind at our back" as he continued to barnstorm across America seeking to bury John McCain's comeback hopes.
http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,24590999-663,00.html
Echoes of the same phrases appear over and over again by different individuals.
Wake up and listen but hear, look and see.
Meanwhile, Barack Obama dismisses concerns about Council on Foreign Relations membership and affiliations with joke about he doesn't use the secret hand signals... then he states blogs are gimmying material?
Yet it's ok for Obama to use a blog to set his own record straight?
Guess what, Obama, that's why many of us bloggers are here, to set the skewed view of what's really occurring, straight, as honestly as we can.
Net the Truth Online
George H. W. Bush's State of the Union Address, Envisioning One Thousand Points of Light
Given on Tuesday, January 29, 1991
Mr. President, Mr. Speaker, members of the United States Congress. I come to this house of the people to speak to you and all Americans, certain we stand at a defining hour.
Halfway around the world, we are engaged in a great struggle in the skies and on the seas and sands. We know why we're there. We are Americans—part of something larger than ourselves.
For two centuries we've done the hard work of freedom. And tonight we lead the world in facing down a threat to decency and humanity.
What is at stake is more than one small country, it is a big idea—a new world order, where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind: peace and security, freedom, and the rule of law. Such is a world worthy of our struggle, and worthy of our children's future.
The community of nations has resolutely gathered to condemn and repel lawless aggression. Saddam Hussein's unprovoked invasion—his ruthless, systematic rape of a peaceful neighbor—violated everything the community of nations holds dear. The world has said this aggression would not stand, and it will not stand.
Together, we have resisted the trap of appeasement, cynicism and isolation that gives temptation to tyrants. The world has answered Saddam's invasion with 12 United Nations resolutions, starting with a demand for Iraq's immediate and unconditional withdrawal, and backed up by forces from 28 countries of six continents. With few exceptions, the world now stands as one...
...We are a nation of rock-solid realism and clear-eyed idealism. We are Americans. We are the nation that believes in the future. We are the nation that can shape the future.
And we've begun to do just that, by strengthening the power and choice of individuals and families.
Together, these last two years, we've put dollars for child care directly in the hands of parents instead of bureaucracies, unshackled the potential of Americans with diabilities, applied the creativity of the marketplace in the service of the environment, for clean air, and made homeownership possible for more Americans...
...The strength of a democracy is not in bureaucracy, it is in the people and their communities. In everything we do, let us unleash the potential of our most precious resource—our citizens. We must return to families, communities, counties, cities, states and institutions of every kind, the power to chart their own destiny, and the freedom and opportunity provided by strong economic growth. That's what America is all about...
...I am heartened that we are not being asked to bear alone the financial burden of this struggle. Last year, our friends and allies provided the bulk of the economic costs of Desert Shield, and having now received commitments of over $40 billion for the first three months of 1991, I am confident they will do no less as we move through Desert Storm.
But the world has to wonder what the dictator of Iraq is thinking. If he thinks that by targeting innocent civilians in Israel and Saudi Arabia, that he will gain an advantage—he is dead wrong. If he thinks that he will advance his cause through tragic and despicable environmental terrorism—he is dead wrong. And if he thinks that by abusing coalition P.O.W.s, he will benefit—he is dead wrong.
We will succeed in the Gulf. And when we do, the world community will have sent an enduring warning to any dictator or despot, present or future, who contemplates outlaw aggression.
The world can therefore seize this opportunity to fulfill the long-held promise of a new world order—where brutality will go unrewarded, and aggression will meet collective resistance.
Yes, the United States bears a major share of leadership in this effort. Among the nations of the world, only the United States of America has had both the moral standing, and the means to back it up. We are the only nation on this earth that could assemble the forces of peace.This is the burden of leadership—and the strength that has made America the beacon of freedom in a searching world.
This nation has never found glory in war. Our people have never wanted to abandon the blessings of home and work, for distant lands and deadly conflict. If we fight in anger, it is only because we have to fight at all. And all of us yearn for a world where we will never have to fight again.
Each of us will measure, within ourselves, the value of this great struggle. Any cost in lives is beyond our power to measure. But the cost of closing our eyes to aggression is beyond mankind's power to imagine.
This we do know: Our cause is just. Our cause is moral. Our cause is right.
Let future generations understand the burden and the blessings of freedom. Let them say, we stood where duty required us to stand.
Let them know that together, we affirmed America, and the world, as a community of conscience.
The winds of change are with us now. The forces of freedom are united. We move toward the next century, more confident than ever, that we have the will at home and abroad, to do what must be done—the hard work of freedom....
http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0900156.html
The Insiders: How and Why America is Being Betrayed
Posted November 12th, 2008
http://www.dailypaul.com/node/72881
More
Back to the Republic
A well-informed citizenry is the most powerful revolutionary force in our Constitutional republic.
BACK TO THE REPUBLIC - THE GOLDEN MEAN: THE STANDARD FORM OF GOVERNMENT
by Harry F. Atwood. Laird & Lee, Inc., 1918 Chapter II
http://members.tripod.com/~DIRTLINE/backtorepublic.html
Atwood books
“Our Republic”
“Our Republic” was originally published in 1918 under the title “Back to the Republic”.
In 1913 the sixteenth amendment (The Income Tax Amendment) was allegedly ratified. In that same year, Congress voted in the existence of the Federal Reserve Act which created a “Central Bank” in The united States of America. Because of those two historic situations, Harry felt compelled to write “Back to the Republic” as a warning to the American People that we were losing our great “Republic” form of government and moving very dangerously into a new form of government called “Democracy”!
In this book, you will learn the differences between an “Autocracy”, “Democracy”, and what lies between them as the Golden Mean: A Republic form of government!
If you have ever recited the “Pledge of Allegiance” in school, at a boy scout meeting, or at any other gathering in your life, it was “to the Republic for which it stands”, not “to the Democracy for which it stands”! Think about that for a moment!!!
“Our Republic” is a must read, if you want to truly understand what you are fighting for and why it is so important to give everything you’ve got to
http://www.freewebs.com/constitution-books/ourrepublic.htm
Atwood Conclusion republished
http://books.google.com/books?id=i0JJAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA147&lpg=PA147&dq=back+to+the+republic+atwood+online+free&source=bl&ots=HltFUghYhm&sig=W1W9S9fJab0aDD7HDZsMAnYU2XI&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=3&ct=result#PPA124,M1
Thursday, October 16, 2008
New World Financial Order
who'd have thunk it? A new world financial order proposed as a solution to the crisis in the United States and now world-wide?
Unfortunately, when former contender for the Republican nomination for President, Ron Paul, had the opportunity to warn Yes, Virginia, there is a conspiracy, not even he dared to appear on the fringe who know there's been a plan for a new world order based on anything, anything for going on 60 years!
After his initial explanations, in the beginning of the video wherein Ron Paul avers, 'they're panicking...' Paul says they're '...socializing the entire financial system...'
He's then specifically asked
'...or do you really suspect there is something bigger afoot here? Is there a conspiracy to take over all the banks?'
Paul answered, 'No. They just have a plan. They believe in socialism and I don't. But there is something very very big happening... end of a monetary system started in '71 ...allowed dollar to be king... everybody propping up the system...everybody holding dollars...
he's worried about this weekend where they're going to come up with a new idea 'they' might come up with one central bank for the world.
then he says... they build up the panic build up the fear TO DO TERRIBLE THINGS
they do it in foreign policy they do it after 9/11 to undermine our system to undermine our freedom. Now they're going to take over all private ownership...'
Really, that's not a conspiracy? they're meeting in secret, no media, no public access, and his words they build up the panic they build up the fear ... and walla they may even come up with a 'new idea' one central bank for the world?
http://netthetruthonline.blogspot.com/2008/10/new-world-financial-order.html
No comments:
Post a Comment