Thursday, March 08, 2007

PETA to Gore: go vegan for global warming

Appearing on Fox 'n Friends this morning, a spokeswoman for PETA says go vegan and save the environment. Lisa... said former Vice President Al Gore as a spokesperson on global warming needs to send the message. She said raising animals and slaughtering them emits more greenhouse gases than all other human methods, combined. (that was a shocking statistic which we covered days ago) While Gore may be able to cut back on consumption of fossil fuels, employ fuel and energy efficiency measures, etc. everyone may not be able to afford to do so. She said everyone can afford to go vegan.

PETA Wants to Fight Global Warming With Food
Wednesday, March 07, 2007
By Brit Hume

Now some fresh pickings from the Political Grapevine:
Diet Change Beats Car Switch

The folks at PETA, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, are calling out Al Gore, saying if he really wants to fight global warming, he should become a vegetarian.

PETA has sent Gore a letter saying giving up meat is the quickest and most effective way to combat climate change because the meat industry is one of the most significant sources of environmental damage.

PETA claims, "raising animals for food generates more greenhouse gases than all the cars and trucks in the world combined." And, it says, researchers have determined that switching to a vegan diet is more effective against global warming than switching from a standard American car to a Toyota Prius hybrid.

Gore's office told FOX News this afternoon it had not yet seen the letter.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,257598,00.html


Clearing a Few Things Up for Al Gore
The PETA Files

...This morning, PETA sent Al a letter to remind him that, among other things, animals raised for food generate more greenhouse gases than all cars and trucks combined, and that (according to a recent University of Chicago study), switching to a vegan diet is more effective in countering global warming than switching from a standard American car to a Prius...

http://blog.peta.org/archives/2007/03/clearing_a_few_1.php


....YOU CAN’T BE A MEAT-EATING ENVIRONMENTALISTTue Mar 06 2007 17:08:05 ET

The Most ‘Inconvenient Truth’: According to U.N., Animals Raised for Food Generate More Greenhouse Gases Than All Cars and Trucks Combined

Norfolk, Va. — This morning, PETA sent a letter to former vice president Al Gore explaining to him that the best way to fight global warming is to go vegetarian and offering to cook him faux “fried chicken” as an introduction to meat-free meals. In its letter, PETA points out that Gore’s film, An Inconvenient Truth—which starkly outlines the potentially catastrophic effects of global warming and just won the Academy Award for “Best Documentary”—has failed to address the fact that the meat industry is the largest contributor to greenhouse-gas emissions.

In the letter, PETA points out the following:

· The effect that our meat addiction is having on the climate is truly staggering. In fact, in its recent report “Livestock’s Long Shadow—Environmental Issues and Options,” the United Nations determined that raising animals for food generates more greenhouse gases than all the cars and trucks in the world combined.

· Researchers at the University of Chicago have determined that switching to a vegan diet is more effective in countering global warming than switching from a standard American car to a Toyota Prius...

http://forums.corvetteforum.com/showthread.php?t=1642310


Cut global warming by becoming vegetarian
Global warming could be controlled if we all became vegetarians and stopped eating meat. That's the view of British physicist Alan Calverd, who thinks that giving up pork chops, lamb cutlets and chicken burgers would do more for the environment than burning less oil and gas.
Writing in this month's Physics World, Calvert calculates that the animals we eat emit 21% of all the carbon dioxide that can be attributed to human activity. We could therefore slash man-made emissions of carbon dioxide simply by abolishing all livestock.

Moreover, there would be no adverse effects to health and it would be an experiment that we could abandon at any stage. "Worldwide reduction of meat production in the pursuit of the targets set in the Kyoto treaty seems to carry fewer political unknowns than cutting our consumption of fossil fuels," he says...

http://www.physorg.com/news4998.html


Libertarian viewpoint

http://veritasnoctis.blogspot.com/

No comments: