Global warming, economy, world what's next

After listening to Hakim's interview, need we warn yet again to what all this is leading? Global world order and global governance.

Peter Hakim, Inter-American Dialogue, president, interviewed on C-Span's Washington Journal

...there's global warming, the global economy, we're part of the global world... supports integration hemisphere-wide, says Hakim

http://www.google.com/search?q=peter+hakim&hl=en&sourceid=gd&rls=GGLD,GGLD:2006-40,GGLD:en

Peter Hakim North American "integration" "union" pro

http://www.google.com/search?q=peter+hakim+north+american+union&btnG=Search&hl=en&rls=GGLD%2CGGLD%3A2006-40%2CGGLD%3Aen

Worldnet daily North American Union con

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&rls=GGLD%2CGGLD%3A2006-40%2CGGLD%3Aen&q=worldnet+daily+north+american+union&btnG=Search

New World Order Drive Behind Global Warming March 12, 2007

http://netthetruthonline.blogspot.com/2007/03/new-world-order-drive-behind-global.html

Toll PA Interstate Highway Political Gimmick

Is it possible I-80 will become part of the federal road project incorporated into Security and Prosperity Partnership Of North America???

Security and Prosperity Partnership Of North America

http://www.spp.gov/

Discussion of import

http://www.hostingphpbb.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=17&mforum=politicalderby

Future of I-80 tolls unclear
By Mike Joseph
Posted on Thu, Aug. 16, 2007

Pennsylvania's two U.S. senators differed Wednesday over whether the state should toll Interstate 80 to raise transportation money, and Gov. Ed Rendell again talked up the idea of leasing the Pennsylvania Turnpike instead.

"Tolling I-80's future is still up and down because of the legislation," Rendell said at an Ag Progress Days news conference, referring to an amendment U.S. Rep. John Peterson added to a U.S. House bill that would block federal money for tolling I-80.

The federal transportation appropriations bill, with the Peterson amendment, has passed the House and is on the U.S. Senate calendar.

But U.S. Sens. Arlen Specter and Robert Casey, in separate Ag Progress Days news conferences, took divergent stances.

Casey said he supports the position of Rendell, who signed Act 44, the state transportation funding bill, into law. The law calls for up to 10 tolling stations along the 311 miles of I-80, to be planned and managed by the state Turnpike Commission.

Of the Peterson amendment, Casey said: "I don't think that's a good idea -- we need all the revenue we can get. ... I don't think it (the amendment) will carry the day in the Senate."

Specter took a hands-off position, saying 511 of the 535 U.S. House and Senate members are from other states and alluding to a proper balance of federal and state authority.

"I-80 tolling has to be decided by the state government," Specter said. "This is a Pennsylvania issue. You don't want all the decisions coming out of Washington, D.C."

Peterson, in yet another impromptu Ag Progress Days news conference, repeated his blistering attack on Act 44, a sign that he's been reinforced by feedback for both his vocal and legislative efforts to undo the measure. He also got noticeably strong and sustained applause when he was introduced to about 500 people at Wednesday's government policy luncheon.

A former state House and state Senate member, Peterson said there's a small but growing movement in the General Assembly to repeal Act 44. He said the law will damage the state's economy and will put the "least trusted agency in state government" -- the Turnpike Commission -- in charge of tolling both the turnpike and I-80.

"It needs to be repealed -- it's just ill-configured," Peterson said. "If they win, taxpayers in Pennsylvania lose."

http://www.centredaily.com/news/local/story/180987.html

Minnesota Bridge Collapse Conspiracy

we'll remain neutral on the Shadow Government angle a while longer. However, don't think there is a plan in the works to connect Mexico, United States, and Canada?

Think again...

Security and Prosperity Partnership Of North America

http://www.spp.gov/

Raises the question which unfortunately isn't as far out there as Katrina conspiracy...

Minnesota Bridge Collapse: Shadow Government Terror?
By Darren Weeks

http://www.darrenweeks.net/2007/08/minnesota-bridge-collapse-was-it-shadow.html

clip

Minnesota Bridge Collapse: Shadow Government Terror?
By Darren Weeks

As I covered last night on the radio broadcast, it seems that my earlier worries about the Minnesota bridge collapse being used as a springboard for more highway privatization is coming to pass.

The Christian Science Monitor published an article on August 10th that questioned, How to pay for US road and bridge repair. In the article, they state:
For infrastructure wonks, it's a rare moment of national focus on an unglamorous responsibility of government. Long neglect, however, has led to an expensive maintenance backlog, meaning lawmakers may look more seriously at newer financing models such as a mileage tax or privatization.
They explore toll roads in depth.

As I pointed out in my blog entry, 'Privatization' the Hegelian Solution to America's Infrastructure Problems, the collapse of this bridge happened along the I-35 "corridor", which is a part of the planned North American Super Highway System. As a part of building this massive transportation project, I-35 must be widened. The plan is to have five lanes in either direction, along with railroads, pipelines, and other utilities.

With the collapse of the I-35 bridge, "President" George W. Bush has pushed for, and CONgress has approved $250,000,000 in emergency funds to rebuild the bridge. According to an August 13th Associated Press report, the bridge will be widened to accommodate additional traffic that will flow when the North American Security and Prosperity Partnership is fully implemented...

...We know that no grant, public or private, ever comes without strings attached. The same is true for federal emergency assistance to rebuild this bridge. It is hence acceptable to presume that this bridge will have to be rebuilt in the timetable and manner, according to the specifications and dictates of the federal government. This is a very convenient development for those who wish to kick-start the North American Super Highway System in the northern part of the country. How many other bridges along the NAFTA corridor system will be replaced now because they are a part of "America's aging infrastructure?"

Additionally, as Nancy Levant and I discussed on the August 6th Govern America, the video footage of the collapse was very peculiar. We were told that the bridge had failed at one end, and then that failure caused the rest of the bridge to fall. But the video that was repeatedly shown on the televised news reports showed the entire center section fall all at once and straight down. Nancy expressed my opinion very well when she said that "it looked like a controlled demolition".

We are now told that police are searching for a man in a kayak that was seen around the bridge just before it collapsed into the Mississippi River. Are we to believe that a man in a kayak actually did something to cause the massive I-35 bridge to collapse?

We are also told that the rebuilding of this bridge will be funded by tolls charged to the end users, or the funds will have to come from public-private partnerships ("privatization"). How ironic that the NASCO corridor will be a privately-funded toll road when the project is completed and opened to the public...

http://www.darrenweeks.net/2007/08/minnesota-bridge-collapse-was-it-shadow.html

http://www.darrenweeks.net/

Also read
http://www.darrenweeks.net/2007/08/privatization-hegelian-solution-to.html